Index: lams_tool_preview/conf/language/lams/ApplicationResources.properties
===================================================================
diff -u -r2df341677611e4e0328f626b763dbeb655c04801 -r919480104e49e8c2055348b663dcb3e688cfe571
--- lams_tool_preview/conf/language/lams/ApplicationResources.properties	(.../ApplicationResources.properties)	(revision 2df341677611e4e0328f626b763dbeb655c04801)
+++ lams_tool_preview/conf/language/lams/ApplicationResources.properties	(.../ApplicationResources.properties)	(revision 919480104e49e8c2055348b663dcb3e688cfe571)
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
 label.rating.author.justify = Ask for hedging justification?
 label.rating.learner.hedge.assign.marks = Assign marks to answers. Max possible mark: 10
 label.rating.learner.justify = Please, justify your mark allocation.
-label.rating.max.hedge = Total hedge mark
+label.rating.max.hedge = Hedge mark
 error.rating.hedge.total.add.up = Marks for criteria {0} must add up to {1}
 error.rating.rank.all = You must rank all the learners for criteria {0}
 label.justify.hedging.marks = Justify your mark allocation.
@@ -248,3 +248,28 @@
 label.rating.rubrics.require.ratings.tooltip.learner = Please assign evaluation to all rubrics and all peers. No blank evaluations allowed.
 label.settings = Settings
 email.crtieria.table.title = Comparison
+label.first.access = First entered on
+label.present = Present
+label.rating.hedge.scale.total = total
+label.rating.hedge.scale.peer = per student in group
+label.rating.rubrics.column.header.1 = Very poor
+label.rating.rubrics.column.header.2 = Poor
+label.rating.rubrics.column.header.3 = Average
+label.rating.rubrics.column.header.4 = Good
+label.rating.rubrics.column.header.5 = Excellent
+label.rating.rubrics.score.max = Max score
+label.rating.rubrics.score = Score:
+label.rating.rubrics.score.max.tooltip = Advanced setting. The mark that the student will receive for each row if the peer selects highest rating. Lower ratings will be scaled accordingly. Mixing rubrics with max score altered and other criteria types is not recommended.
+label.rating.rubrics.ai.fill = AI Complete
+label.rating.rubrics.ai.fill.confirm = Are you sure that you want to overwrite existing rubric explanations?
+label.rating.rubrics.view.slider = slider
+label.print = Print
+label.rating.rubrics.in.between.categories = in-between two categories
+label.minimum.number.words.placeholder = Type at least {0} word(s)...
+label.authoring.ai = AI features
+label.authoring.ai.rephrase = AI assisted quantitative feedback
+label.authoring.ai.rephrase.tooltip = When this option is enabled, students who are giving open-ended peer feedback will be offered an AI-assisted suggestion that rephrases their comments into more constructive, specific, and actionable language. The AI draws on what the student has written, helping to model effective feedback without replacing the student''s original input. Students can review and edit the AI suggestion before submitting. This feature is designed to support clearer communication and improve the overall quality of peer feedback.
+label.rating.comment.ai.rephrase.button = AI Rephrase
+label.rating.comment.ai.rephrase.description = Perhaps you might want to consider rephrasing your input into constructive and actionable feedback.
+label.authoring.replace.button = Replace
+label.rating.rubrics.in.between.categories.tootlip = Demonstrates a combination of attributes described both above and below.